<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;QUICK PUFF&#8221; &#8211; Casa Magna Oscuro Robusto</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.smokescore.com/2009/11/13/quick-puff-casa-magna-oscuro-robusto/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.smokescore.com/2009/11/13/quick-puff-casa-magna-oscuro-robusto/</link>
	<description>SmokeScore.com - An Independant Cigar Review Journal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 21:34:43 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.smokescore.com/2009/11/13/quick-puff-casa-magna-oscuro-robusto/comment-page-1/#comment-968</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 08:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smokescore.com/?p=677#comment-968</guid>
		<description>Your assessment is right on target.  I too was hoping it would be a bit stronger.  Although I only smoked one, I prefer the Colorado.  I am going to age it for a bit and see if it gets any better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your assessment is right on target.  I too was hoping it would be a bit stronger.  Although I only smoked one, I prefer the Colorado.  I am going to age it for a bit and see if it gets any better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cigars</title>
		<link>http://www.smokescore.com/2009/11/13/quick-puff-casa-magna-oscuro-robusto/comment-page-1/#comment-650</link>
		<dc:creator>Cigars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 22:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smokescore.com/?p=677#comment-650</guid>
		<description>I agree with your assessment of the Oscuro. I think it needs to sit longer and it could be a better than average. However, at this point, it&#039;s just an average cigar.  Even at $6 its still pretty &quot;iffy&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with your assessment of the Oscuro. I think it needs to sit longer and it could be a better than average. However, at this point, it&#8217;s just an average cigar.  Even at $6 its still pretty &#8220;iffy&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
