<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SmokeScore.com &#187; Aged</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.smokescore.com/category/aged/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.smokescore.com</link>
	<description>SmokeScore.com - An Independant Cigar Review Journal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 02:31:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>&#8220;AGED&#8221; Review &#8211; Camacho Liberty 2003</title>
		<link>http://www.smokescore.com/2010/01/30/aged-review-camacho-liberty-2003/</link>
		<comments>http://www.smokescore.com/2010/01/30/aged-review-camacho-liberty-2003/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 02:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony Ricciardi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aged]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cigar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Camacho]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cigar Inn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smokescore.com/?p=777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Tonight&#8217;s review is the first in our new section &#8220;AGED&#8221; Reviews.
Our first &#8220;AGED&#8221; Review will be the Camacho Liberty 2003.
On a trip to CigarInn on the Upper East Side of New York City, I happened to be digging through the piles and piles of boxes that Gus and his brothers have in their walk-in humidor. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.smokescore.com/2010/01/30/aged-review-camacho-liberty-2003/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Section &#8211; &#8220;Aged&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.smokescore.com/2009/12/27/new-section-aged/</link>
		<comments>http://www.smokescore.com/2009/12/27/new-section-aged/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 04:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony Ricciardi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aged]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cigar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smokescore.com/?p=751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As we roll into 2010, SmokeScore is proud to announce a new section called &#8220;Aged&#8221;.
The &#8220;Aged&#8221; section reviews will focus on cigars that have been properly stored for long term aging.
We will be reviewing sticks with a minimum of two years of age but many will have 5, 10 even 30 years of age.
&#8220;Aged&#8221; reviews [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.smokescore.com/2009/12/27/new-section-aged/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
